Palms on floor robotic & drone design collection half I: mechanical & wheels

It is a new collection wanting on the detailed design of varied robots. To start out with we might be wanting on the design of two completely different robots that have been used for the DARPA Subterranean Problem. Each of those robots have been designed for working in advanced subterranean environments, together with Caves, Mines & City environments. Each of those robots offered are from the Carnegie Mellon College Explorer crew. Whereas I’m writing these posts, this was a crew effort that required many individuals to achieve success. (If anybody on Crew Explorer is studying this, thanks for all the things, you’re all superior.)

These posts are skipping the system necessities step of the design course of. See right here for extra particulars on defining system necessities.

R3 Floor robotic (UGV)

For the SubT problem three floor automobiles have been developed all of a similiar design. The bottom robots have been recognized with the moniker of R#, the place # is the order we constructed them in. The first distinction between the three variations are

R1 – Static Chassis, so the chassis has minimal floor compliance when driving over obstacles and uneven surfaces. R1 was initially speculated to have a differencing mechanism for compliance, nonetheless as a result of time constraints it was omitted from this primary model. R1 is pictured above.

R2 – Has the differencing mechanism and was designed as initially deliberate.

R3 – Is sort of similar to R2, however smaller. This robotic was constructed for navigating smaller areas and likewise to have the ability to climb up and down steps. It additionally makes use of completely different motors for the driving the wheels.

DS drone

The unique drone design utilized by Crew Explorer referred to as their drones D1, D2, and so forth.. This let a mixture of UGV +Drone go by joint designations comparable to R2D2. Early on, the crew switched to a smaller drone design that was known as DS1, DS2, and so forth.. The place DS is brief for Drone Small.

The drone design submit are break up into two sections. The primary is concerning the precise drone platform, and the second is concerning the payload that sat on high of the drone.

Mechanical & wheels

Robotic dimension choice

After we now have the listing of system necessities we begin with the design of the mechanical construction of the robotic. On this case we determined {that a} wheeled robotic could be finest. We needed to have the most important wheels potential to assist climb over obstacles, nonetheless, we additionally wanted to maintain our sensors on the high of the automobile above the wheels and be capable to slot in openings 1 x 1 meters. These necessities set the utmost dimension of the robotic in addition to the utmost dimension of the wheels.

The ultimate dimensions of the primary two automobiles (R1 and R2) have been round (L x W x H) 1.2 x 0.8 x 0.8 meters (3.9 x 2.6 x 2.6 ft). The third smaller automobile was round 1 x 0.6 m (3.2 x 1.9 ft) and designed to suit by way of 0.7×0.7 m openings.

Steering strategy

Early on we additionally wanted to find out the strategy of driving. Do we wish wheels or tracks? Will we wish to steer with ackerman steering, rocker-bogie, skid steer, and so forth.?

See right here for extra particulars on steering choice.

We selected to make use of a skid steer 4 wheeled drive strategy for the simplicity of management and the power to show in place (level turns). Firstly of the competitors we weren’t targeted on stair climbing, which could have modified a few of our design choices.

Suspension

The following step was to find out the suspension kind. A suspension is required so that each one 4 of the wheels make contact with the bottom. If the robotic had a static mounted body solely three of the wheels would possibly make contact with the bottom when on uneven surfaces. This would cut back our stability and traction.

We determined early on that we needed a passive suspension for the simplicity of not having energetic elements. With a passive suspension we have been taking a look at completely different kind of physique averaging. We roughly had two selections, front-pivot or side-to-side.

We determined to decide on the front-pivot technique, nonetheless we determined to make the pivot be roughly centered within the automobile. This allowed us to place all the electronics within the entrance and the batteries within the rear. The front-pivot technique we felt could be higher for climbing up stairs and for climbing over obstacles on stage’ish terrain. Additionally importantly this strategy made it simpler to hold a drone on the bottom automobile.

Chassis design

At this level we began designing the chassis. This was an essential step in order that we may estimate the whole weight with a purpose to spec the drive-train. Concepts for the chassis have been all the things from constructing with 80/20 to constructing an aluminum body and populating it with elements, to a stable welded chassis. We chosen to make use of a welded metal tube chassis for the energy. We wanted a robotic that would survive something we did to it. This proved to be a sensible choice when the robotic crashed or fell over cliffs. The draw back of the metal was elevated mass.

For the pivot we discovered a big crossed curler bearing that we have been in a position to make use of to connect the 2 metal packing containers collectively. The big bore within the center was helpful for passing wires/cables by way of for batteries, motors, and so forth…

A part of the chassis design was additionally figuring out the place all the elements ought to mount. Having the batteries (inexperienced packing containers in picture above) within the rear helps us climb obstacles. Different objectives have been to maintain the bottom clearance as excessive as potential whereas conserving the middle of gravity (CG) as little as potential. Since these are competing objectives, a part of the design course of was to develop a cheerful medium.

With a view to keep modularity for service, every wheel module had the motor controller, motor, gear field, and bearing block as a stable unit that might be swapped between robots if there was any points. This additionally allowed many of the wiring to be a part of that block. The one cables that wanted to be linked to every of the modules from the robotic have been energy, CAN communications, and the emergency cease line; all of which have been connectorized.

For electronics on R1 and R2 we constructed an electronics field that was separate from the robotic and might be faraway from the robotic as wanted. On R3 we constructed the electronics into the robotic itself. This modular strategy was very helpful once we needed to do some welding to the chassis post-build for modifications. The draw back of the modular strategy for electronics was that working within the electronics field was tougher then within the open R3. Additionally the time for fabricating and wiring the R1/R2 electronics packing containers was significantly greater than the open R3 electronics. We additionally had a number of failures throughout testing associated to the connectors from the electronics packing containers.

Wheel design

We debated so much about what kind of wheel to make use of, finally we used motorbike wheels as a result of simplicity of acquiring them and mounting them. The wheel diameter we desired additionally lined up very properly with motorbike wheels. With a view to get higher traction and skill to climb over obstacles we preferred the broader tires.

R1 and R2 had a wheel diameter of 0.55m, R3 had a wheel diameter of 0.38m. This gave R1 and R2 a floor clearance of 0.2m, and R3 a floor clearance of 0.12m.

The wheel hubs ended up being a distinct story. We discovered stable metallic rims that we needed to machine massive quantities of metallic out of with a purpose to stability the energy and the burden.

The R1 and R2 robots have been round 180kg (400lb)*, the wheels have been for a automobile considerably heavier. As such we put a small quantity of stress within the wheels to maintain them from falling off, nonetheless we tried to maintain the stress low to extend the bottom compliance of the wheels. This technique added a really small quantity of compliance, we tried eradicating among the rubber from the sidewalls, however was not capable of get a cheerful medium between limiting the wheel deforming throughout level turns and rising floor compliance.

We have been additionally involved how the motorbike tires would do when level turning and if we might rip the wheels from the edges. To counter this we put in a beadlock system into every of the wheels. The beadlock was a curved phase put in in a number of locations to sandwich the tire to the rim. We by no means had a wheel separate from the rim, so our strategy undoubtedly labored, nonetheless it was a ache to put in.

*R3 was round 90 kg (200 lbs). We tried utilizing completely different wheels and tracks to get R3 to climb stairs properly. Nevertheless that story is for one more submit…

Drive-train choice

Now that we had a mass estimate and system necessities for pace and impediment clearance we are able to begin to spec the drive-train. The opposite piece of knowledge that we wanted and needed to focus on with {the electrical} crew was the voltage of the battery. Completely different bus voltages tremendously impacts the motors accessible for a given pace and torque. We selected a 51.2v nominal bus voltage. This offered an issue because it was very exhausting to search out the pace/torques we needed at that voltage. We ended up deciding on a 400W 1/2HP motor+gearbox from Oriental Motors with a parallel 100:1 gearbox that permits us to drive at a most pace of two.5m/s.

The half numbers of the motors and gearbox on R1 and R2 have been BLVM640N-GFS + GFS6G100FR.

The half numbers of the motors and gearbox on the smaller R3 have been Maxon EC 90 Flat + GP81A.

Subsequent steps

Now that we all know the mechanics of the robotic we are able to begin constructing it. Within the subsequent submit we are going to begin wanting on the electronics and motor controls. Whereas the character of the weblog makes it appear that this design is a serial course of, in actuality numerous issues are taking place in parallel. Whereas the mechanical crew is designing the chassis, {the electrical} crew is discovering {the electrical} elements wanted to ensure that the mechanical particular person to know what wants mounted.

It’s also essential to work with {the electrical} crew to determine wire routing whereas the chassis is being developed.

---

Word of the editor: This submit has been merged from the posts “Palms On Floor Robotic & Drone Design Collection” and “Mechanical & Wheels – Palms On Floor Robotic Design“.

---